Texas Business Court holds that unrelated historical transactions under a master services agreement cannot be aggregated to satisfy the $5 million “qualified transaction” jurisdictional threshold.
Where Business Meets the Bench | Updates from the Texas Business Court and Fifteenth Court of Appeals
Jennifer Bartlett litigates complex commercial and technology disputes across the country. She has represented clients in a variety of matters involving software in the AI, SaaS, health care, and cryptocurrency sectors, investor and computer fraud, failed private equity transactions, data security, trademark disputes, environmental actions, and regulatory issues. Jennifer has second-chaired two high-stakes preliminary injunction trials in the internet technology field involving multiple weeks of testimony across CFAA, Lanham Act, unfair competition, defamation, antitrust, and other related claims. She has defeated multiple motions for injunctive relief, prevailed on summary judgment resulting in the dismissal of all claims against clients, and argued motions to compel, to dismiss, and for reconsideration. Jennifer manages teams of lawyers on various matters to efficiently provide quality outcomes for clients. Jennifer has wide-ranging experience in both state and federal court, arbitration tribunals, administrative settings, and has handled appeals of district court and administrative decisions.
Texas Business Court holds that unrelated historical transactions under a master services agreement cannot be aggregated to satisfy the $5 million “qualified transaction” jurisdictional threshold.…